Suppression of Imagination and Intuitive Thinking by Technology
    MFMP Seeks Input on Their "New Fire" Campaign

    I’ve had the privileged of being introduced to a new spin on the structure of an atom. Now pretty much everyone who remembers their physics 101 knows that the atom is described as a combination of Proton(s) and Neutron(s) as a core and one or more electron rotating around the core at near the speed of light. Now the only way scientists have come to believe this theory is through evidence gathered with Scanning Tunneling Microscopes (STM). A short explanation of how STMs work: A very fine tip electrode is placed near a molecule and very sensitive sensors measure what is believed to be electrons passing by the electrode tip. A computer then tracks those measurements over time and plots a model of what we think the atom composition is. We currently have no way to visibly view an atom. The structure of an atom is computed with algorithms and a computer program. While this is a very simple description of STM, the fact still remains the same. Our model of an atom is computer generated and has ever been observed in reality. I believe STMs are very useful and accurate in determining the structure of molecules, there is still room for error in the basic model of an atom we currently use. This fact has spurred many scientists to attempt to come up with other theories of the structure of our basic building block; the atom. Might I add that the inconsistencies of our current  atomic structure have led to a completely separate area of physics called Quantum mechanics. Just to give you an idea of how many observed violations of our currently accepted physics model you can read about them here: List of unsolved problems in physics.


    Key Ring Atom

    Electron Microscope view of an atom.


    Key Ring concept imbed on electron microscope view.

    Key Ring concept imbed on electron microscope view.


    Now that you know where my doubt in our current model comes from, let me introduce the Key Ring Atom.
    For starters lets compare the current model of the hydrogen atom and how the hydrogen atom would look using the Key Ring Theory. The hydrogen atom using the standard model has a single proton at it’s core with a single electron rotating around the proton near the speed of light. The standard model describes the bulk of the energy of an atom being at the proton and the electron shares a very low portion of the atom’s energy. The electron in the standard model spins so fast that it takes the appearance of an electron cloud or an electron shield around the proton. In the Key ring hydrogen atom, visualize a single proton ring at the core and an electron ring linked through the proton ring. Now the only difference between the 2 theories would be that the center of the standard atom is the proton whereas the key ring atom core is empty due to the the proton ring. The electron cloud on both would appear the same due to the speed of rotation. Keep in mind that our current method of mapping an atom does not allow us to see the center of an atom. For all we know it is a blank. I heard of the Key Ring Atom Theory through an associate of Bob Rohner who happens to be the theorist behind it. Dannel Roberts has been searching and compiling information supporting his theory of the Key Ring Atom for over 40 years. He was unsatisfied with the current explanation of the atomic structure and chose to devote most of his life searching for a different explanation that would also fit our current molecular model. I have to admit the theory is quite complex and would take a long time to explain in full here. To read the full theory and it’s explanations or even watch video presentations on the theory, you can visit

    [youtube QlvSWPOTGqI&list=UUHWyVL1M3i0kzz3yGeWjpyQ&index=1]


    One thing to note when describing the standard model of an atom is the duck tape phenomenon we call the Strong Force. It’s not uncommon to see in physics calculations an error factor. When calculating something very large you tend to not be able to account for all variables so you add in a correction factor. Through experience with EM physics and loss calculations, I’ve always questioned my peers about variables in the equations labeled error factor or cleverly disguised as system noise. I always got the same answer. That was “push the i believe button” There are some things we can’t account for. In the standard atom model, there is a mysterious unknown force called the Strong Force. This is used as the reason an electron stays in orbit around a proton. It’s also used as the reason for why atoms can adhere to other atoms. This doesn’t set right with me. Due to the geometry of the Dannel Roberts key ring atom theory, adhesion is possible with no fudge factor, Electron orbit is explained with no fudge factor, and 10 other physical traits of the atom are all accounted for with no “Fudge” or duck tape. Molecules of matter are all linked together in chains physically and there is no question as to why.

    Here is a demonstration video by Dannel Roberts on the structure of water using the Key Ring Atom Theory:

    [youtube kR5tgD–LuA]

    Dannel Roberts has obviously put a lifetime of effort into building the Key Ring Atom theory and in my point of view it makes total sense. While we cannot physically see an atom’s true structure, why would we continue believing a theory full of flaws, inconsistencies, and duck tape? I admit that the Key Ring Atom may not be the answer, but the current atomic theory is in error. I recommend visiting and approaching this new theory with an open mind. Ask yourself: Does the current theory of atomic structure have a solid foundation? Is it possible that the Key Ring Atom holds the key to the answers. Please offer your opinions in the forum below.





    Enhanced by Zemanta
    Suppression of Imagination and Intuitive Thinking by Technology
    MFMP Seeks Input on Their "New Fire" Campaign
    Twitter Auto Publish Powered By :