U-Plug 100 UPDATE 2: Another magnetic powered generator claim?
    Bio-diesel in just 10 seconds

    Thanks to our regular contributor TXT29 we have an update on the testing of the ADGEX Flashlight. This can really be put in the Scam barsket.

    Known Results of ELFE Owners’ Testing Link: https://www.metabunk.org/claim-harvesting-energy-from-schumann-resonances-and-earths-em-field-adgex.t7285/#post-176739

    Successful Tests (0% – 0 of 6 completed):
    None known.
    The only positive report I am aware of, comes from a second-hand claim by Alan Whicker (an ELFE supporter in the ELFE Owners Group on Facebook) telling “I know of 2 people, who are not here, who are very happy with the torches. They are simply just using them, not doing tests of any kind”. When asked about the happy users, links to videos of Ray “Greenmeresearch” were posted. Ray is another member of the FB group, who came to the conclusion that the ELFE flashlight does not work as specified, after 3 weeks of testing (see below).

    adgex-flashlight-free-energy

    Unsuccessful Tests (100% – 6 of 6 completed):
    DEDcolorado (YouTube) – the authenticity of his YT videos were confirmed by Mr. Muzanov, ELFE salesman at ADGEX, as well as by Mr. Ivchenko, an ADGEX director. DEDcolorado disassembled the flashlight (demonstrating it does not contain anything else than an LED, 3 AA batteries, and a button switch), and measured the current before the test (~1A corresponding to ~3W LED), and then after 10 hours of lighting and 3 weeks of rest (the flashlight is claimed to fully recharge itself within 7-14 days), he measured quickly decreasing current of ~2-3% of the nominal power (20-35mA instead of the 1A)

    Skywatcher (Overunity.com) – former ELFE supporter, used very systematical testing, showing good experience in using luxmeter. His results excluded any recharging both at shorter burns and 24 hours of rest, as well as at discharged batteries (to ~1%) and a week-long rest time. See posts #20, #21, #23 and #24)

    TheCell (Overunity.com) – former ELFE supporter. His ELFE flashlight, after 14 days of rest, came back as discharged as left after the initial tests. He did not measure the light in any way, but even just observing the light, the depletion of the batteries was so evident that no doubts were left.

    Arman Gevorkyan (FB ELFE group) – he measured the light emitted by the ELFE flashlight with a lightmeter application on a smartphone. He measured persistent significant discharging while doing shorter daily test burns, with no signs of recharging during multiple days (see post #22 with his initial values. Following tests with equally negative results are documented on Facebook, in the FB ELFE group)

    Ray Greenmeresearch (FB ELFE group) – former ELFE supporter. He came to the conclusion that the flashlight does not work as specified, after having done several tests, including a 14 days long rest for allowing the “recharge”, just to find the flashlight did not recharge. (see posts #6 and #15 for more details).

    Egon Baran (FB ELFE group) – he discharged an ELFE and an ordinary flashlight with a long run, till they dimmed dark, and compared their lights after long rest (42 hours rest at ELFE and 24 hours at the ordinary light) to find out that during 11 hours long run the ordinary flashlight recovered to higher brightness than ELFE. (the test continues, though)

    Tests in Progress:
    Egon Baran (FB ELFE group) – he continues in the test, despite the worse Battery Recovery Phenomena at ELFE than at an ordinary flashlight.

    Esa Juhani Ruoho (FB ELFE group) – owner of two ELFE flashlights. He tested one of them by a simple observation. He has let the light on during 5 days; after half a day it dimmed and continued to light at low power. During three subsequent days he briefly checked the brightness after letting the flashlight resting for a day. The observed intensity was slightly higher, and did not increase in subsequent tests. The light will now rest for a full week before another test is performed. So far this observation did not indicate any self-recharging or power increase other than caused by the Battery Relaxation Phenomena.

    Original Story

    Update 2: These little gems came form the ELFE Facebook users site

    Quick and dirty test results so far: cheap China flashlight triple A batteries ( batteries about a year old, flashlight used once in a while), burn time about 8 hours (I forgot about it, it was completely off when I came back). Took the battery pack out (I wanted to make sure that it’s off, it has a 3way switch). Recovering time 12 hours. Flashlight came back to good brightness, still holding. I expect 4-6 hours, I will tell you guys later.

    The “recharging” of the ELFE Flashlight may be easily explained with commonly known behavior of chemical batteries. Namely, the reason is called the “battery relaxation phenomena”.

    Due to electro-chemical and thermal processes in the electrolyte and in the electrodes, the voltage starts decreasing faster than the charge (energy). LEDs are sensitive to the input voltage, hence a small decrease of the voltage results in a great reduction of luminosity, and for the user it looks like the battery is depleted, although it may be still very far from that state. When the load is removed, diffusion and reverse chemical processes lead to the increase of the voltage during the rest (2 hours are usually sufficient for Li-ion batteries). And since the previous deep drop of the voltage prevented the LED draining the charge of the battery, with the voltage recovered, the LED will light at full force for significant period of time again, after the rest. This cycle may be repeated many times before the battery is discharged completely.

    There is a scientific paper, explaining the voltage recovery during the relaxation period in greater details. If you do not want to read the entire paper, have a look at the Fig.2, and read the couple of paragraphs above it

    Skywatcher, another fresh owner of the ELFE flashlight, started to test it today. He measures the illumination with a luxmeter, and just published his first results:

    18:30:00 26000 lux
    18:40:00 28800 lux
    18:50:00 28700 lux
    19:00:00 29000 lux
    19:10:00 28900 lux
    19:20:00 28800 lux
    19:30:00 28700 lux
    19:40:00 28600 lux
    19:50:00 28200 lux
    20:00:00 27500 lux
    20:10:00 26200 lux
    20:20:00 24200 lux
    20:30:00 20000 lux
    20:40:00 11400 lux

    He turned it off after 2 hours and 10 min, because the luminosity started to drop sharply.

    From our own Comments section (thanks Matt)

    In the Elfe users group on facebook, Ray, who is running a series of tests, says test run 3 is going to be somewhat disappointing. The light fades quickly. Seems that test no. 4 will reveal the truth. After 14 days it should be fully recharged, being able to shine for around 10 hours. There is now one more guy in this group who got his torch doing tests. If this is a scam (and imho it is one) it won’t last long.

    From txt29

    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/claim-harvesting-energy-from-schumann-resonances-and-earths-em-field-adgex.t7285/#post-176115

    1. From the beginning it was apparent that the alleged “charging” of the ELFE battery is most likely just a “rebouncing” effect, well know by many people using LED flashlights frequently. Although it is a commonly known that a battery regains its power after a period of rest, not everyone understands why it happens. Some people think the battery recharges itself. The reality is that due to electro-chemical and thermal processes in the electrolyte and in the electrodes, the voltage starts decreasing faster than the charge (energy). LEDs are sensitive to the input voltage, hence the small decrease in the voltage results in great reduction of luminosity, and for the user it looks like the battery is depleted, although it may be still very far from that state. When the load is removed, diffusion and reverse chemical processes lead to the increase of the voltage. And since the previous deep drop of the voltage prevented the LED draining the charge of the battery, with the voltage recovered, the LED will light at full force for significant period of time again, after the rest. This cycle may be repeated many times before the battery is discharged completely.

      The following scientific paper explains the process at Li-ion batteries in great details. There may be slight differences among different types of chemical batteries, but the principle remains the same at most of them.

      Challenges and Solutions in Battery Fuel Gauging

      Below, I am also attaching a link of two diagrams from the PDF. It shows the voltage recovery after the load is removed at a fully charged battery (top), and at a depleted battery (bottom). The ideal recovery time at Li-ion batteries is around 2 hours (that comes from another paper)

      [​IMG]

    2. PESN (website promoting Free Energy) published yesterday an article attempting to discount the Battery Relaxation Phenomena described in the previous post. Stuart Campbell, a moderator at PESN, runs a test attempting to demonstrate that the “rebounce” effect is negligible:

      http://pesn.com/2016/02/16/9602721_NiMH_Batterys/

      Stuart Campbell is well aware of the difference between LED and halogen bulb. He writes himself:

      Yet, he performs his “test” with a halogen bulb instead of an LED! So, he is very well aware that unlike an LED, a halogen bulb continues to draw significant current from the battery as the voltage drops, yet he decides testing with the halogen bulb! It clearly shows the bias, and reveals the true purpose of his test – not an objective verification, but a manipulation of the less educated readers into accepting his agenda.

      Unlike at a halogen bulb, at an LED the luminosity and the current are strongly depending on the right voltage. The sharp drop of luminosity was also documented by Skywatcher (member at overunity.org) who measured the illumination of the ELFE flashlight with a luxmeter. At the first run (fully charged batteries), the measured intensity was as follows:

      18:30:00 26000 lux
      18:40:00 28800 lux
      18:50:00 28700 lux
      19:00:00 29000 lux
      19:10:00 28900 lux
      19:20:00 28800 lux
      19:30:00 28700 lux
      19:40:00 28600 lux
      19:50:00 28200 lux
      20:00:00 27500 lux
      20:10:00 26200 lux
      20:20:00 24200 lux
      20:30:00 20000 lux
      20:40:00 11400 lux

      He turned it off after 2 hours and 10 min, because the luminosity started to drop sharply. Additionally, the efficiency of a LED is not directly proportional to the current. That means that any tests, where the flashlight runs up to 12 hours at a time, will not draw considerably more energy from the battery than it happens within those 2 first hours (actually already at 1:30, the decrease of luminosity is significant, and the decrease of power would be more than proportionally higher).

      The diagram below [source] demonstrates that at a relative change of the battery potential of only 15% (drop from 3.9V to 3.3V), the current drops by 80% (from 75 mA to 15mA). In this example, the power drops from ~300mW (3.9V*75mA) to ~50mW (3.3V*15mA), it means by 84% (while the voltage decreased only 15%). In other words, once the voltage drops below certain threshold, the power drain is minimized, and the flashlight may go on lighting at very low power (~6 times lower in the example) for several hours, without discharging the battery significantly.

      [​IMG]

    Update 1

    Although the translation did not work that well on YouTube, from what I can gather from the diagrams, it is claiming to harvest RF, EMF and the earths magnetic field. If any of our readers can translate Russian it would be appreciated.

    Given the number of other aluminium cased flashlights on the market, it would be interesting to see how using the same batteries they would perform in comparison. All past research I have seen on harvesting RF and EMF has not produced anywhere near the amount of power needed to power a light like this. However I am happy to be corrected

    The Claim

    ELFE is a unique product. You will be never in need of changing batteries in your flashlight and the batteries will never run down! ELFE has no any batteries at all! It generates required energy from the environment.”

    The Theory

    The ELFE Flashlight is claimed to be powered by Schumann Resonance – here’s how the company describe the potential for harvesting the energy energy and what they call their ‘accumulator’ which is supposedly the important component collecting.

    ‘accumulating’ the energy.“It is widely known that we live in a world saturated by electro-magnetic emissions. Most, however, don’t grasp the pure volume of power that our planet and its sun provide. The Earth’s magnetic field for example, emits power estimated at around 2,6992139х1024 watts. When compared to the meagre 5×1012 watts generated by all the power stations on Earth, the magnitude of the Earths power becomes apparent.

    To understand this energy, we must follow the flow of the electron neutrino which pierces the Earth’s atmosphere in all directions. The initial source of atmospheric electricity originates from local currents and is counter acted by dynamic charges within clouds. The resulting lightning strikes pump energy into the earth-atmosphere cavity, and cause it to vibrate or resinate at extremely low frequencies; an effect called the Schumann resonance. These ultra-low frequency electro-magnetic oscillations come laden with reactive energy and travel around the Earth at the speed of light. The oscillations don’t fade, have fixed frequencies, and can provide an endless supply of energy to anyone who knows how to convert it.

    The Adgex Accumulator has been designed by ADGEX ENERGY to convert the Earths energy. This technology has been successfully piloted in ELFE, the world’s first ‘Free-Energy’ flashlight, and it has shone light on a world of ‘Free-Energy’ possibilities. The team at ADGEX ENERGY look forward to creating more innovative products across a diverse range of applications, as we add fuel to the clean energy revolution.”

    Source: http://freeenergy.news/news/adgex-flashlight-powered-by-earths-magnetic-field/

    The Question

    I never derive any pleasure out of busting free energy claims, I do it for my own education and hopefully putting a halt to some scam artists. We have covered this product before and suggested that it was a possible scam or at least some serious questions should be asked..  Based on the following you can make up your own mind.

    1. The video’s of a customer disassembling the flashlight and testing
    2. Debunking the science claims
    3. The Company

    Debunking the Science

    The following was posted by  at Metabunk .com by a contributor known as txt29

    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/claim-harvesting-energy-from-schumann-resonances-and-earths-em-field-adgex.t7285/

    Physics

    1. Earth’s Magnetic Field – I admit, that although I knew that energy cannot be harvested from a static electromagnetic field without any motion relative to it, I was not sure how much and how quickly the Earth’s magnetic field fluctuates to see how much energy could be potentially available. I knew it is negligible, but have looked it up more precisely – Wikipedia tells it ranges from 25 to 65 microteslas, and typical local variations in the magnetic field at the surface are of the order of 1 nanotesla per second. I even found pages addressing this exact problem. The best one so far is probably the article atScienceBlogs that concludes: “We’re interested in the time rate of change of this flux, and let’s say we have a circle with a diameter of 1 meter. The rate of change of the flux is thus (1 nanotesla/second)*(3.14 meters^2). Which is 3.14×10^-9 volts. Three one-billionths of a volt per square meter of flux-collecting surface. If you tried very hard you might be able to finagle some useful energy out of such a small potential, perhaps with very long superconducting solenoids.“In other words – you cannot generate any non-negligible energy by harvesting the Earth’s magnetic field with a device of the size of a small pocket torch.
    2. Schumann resonances – again, I did not know much about these, so had to have a look at theWikipedia again – “[they] are a set of spectrum peaks in the extremely low frequency (ELF) portion of the Earth’s electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, generated and excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere.“Basically, we learn that the strength of both the EM and magnetic field of the Schumann resonances is far too weak:“The Schumann resonance electric field amplitude (~300 microvolts per meter) is much smaller than the static fair-weather electric field … Similarly, the amplitude of the Schumann resonance magnetic field (~1 picotesla) is many orders of magnitude smaller than the Earth’s magnetic field (~30–50 microteslas).” , Although the field oscillates faster than the fluctuations of the Earth magnetic field, again no non-negligible energy could be harvested with a device of the size of a pocket flashlight.
    3. Neutrinos – for some reason, in context with Schumann resonances, ADGEX speaks about electron neutrinos. I did not find any link between Schumann resonances and electron neutrinos, so I guess ADGEX used “neutrino” just as a magic word, because common folk knows little about neutrinos, hence weird and unexpected effects can be attributed to them. Regardless, neutrinos interact with matter only extremely weakly:“Neutrinos traveling through matter, in general, undergo a process analogous to light traveling through a transparent material.” [Wikipedia]Again, no energy at all can be exploited from neutrinos by a device of this size.
      .
    4. Shielding – the flashlight has a full metal body. Although it would not shield much against the magnetic field, it would almost perfectly shield any EM field (including Schumann resonances)
      .
    5. Empirical evidence – besides the plentiful videos promoting ADGEX on YouTube, I manage to find a video of a Russian who managed to buy one of the ELFE flashlights and disassembled it. He had to file down the cap, because the flashlight was not made to be opened. However, he managed to do it without damaging it. If you do not understand any Russian, turn on the machine generated English subtitles in the video settings:

    The Company

    Looking into the past activities of a company and more importantly the people involved are always a fair indicator of the authenticity of the claims being made. The following is a a collection of websites that have more than a few negative things to say. At this point I have no further interest in pursuing any inquiries further and will let the readers make up their own minds.

    The websites of ADGEX  

    http://www.adgex.com

     http://trade.adgex.com.au/ 

    http://www.adgex.eu/ 

    The following is from a Russian investor adviser who suggested ADGEX was not a good risk for investment

    http://marslanov.com/2014/09/10/audit-kompanii-adgex/

    Another Russian website describes alleged scams for another  project perpetrated by Viktor Uzlov

     http://transnet-rus.livejournal.com/17350.html

    These sites may or may not be reliable and I am happy to be corrected or have other information brought forward they may shed a different Light.

    Other people are receiving their lights so I am sure there will be many other reports confirming or denying the reality of this technology. I am always happy to be proven incorrect.Based on the above information I am not convinced at all

    Other Coverage: http://overunity.com/16003/worlds-first-real-free-energy-flashlight-no-shaking-no-batteries-no-solar/195/#.Vr2RKfl97IU

     

    U-Plug 100 UPDATE 2: Another magnetic powered generator claim?
    Bio-diesel in just 10 seconds
    Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com